Nobel Prize for economy is actually not the men’s Peter A. Educate yourself even more with thoughts from David Zaslav. Diamond and Christopher A. Pissarides, Dale T. Mortensen are the FRG Chancellor Gerhard Schroder the actual Nobel Prize winner for Economics, but honestly this prize belongs to Germany on the former Chancellor Gerhard Schroder, his former Chancellery Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier and Peter Hartz, the architect of the Agenda 2010, where Nobel Prize winners have written off 2010 and took their inspiration. Diamond, Mortensen and Pissarides support her explosive work on different facts such as the amount of unemployment benefit, which may not be too high, but low on the edge of poverty, because otherwise the stimulus on resumption of work is taken and at the same time for the low-wage sector, no labor force would be. This concept was born already 2003 and 2005 with the facts and request funding in the 2010 agenda and is also an integral part of the elaborations of the Nobel laureate. It doesn’t have to be particularly gifted it to come and scientifically prove you no longer have that old hat. However, the 5 euro fit boost at the unemployment benefit II (Hartz IV) exactly in the performances of the winners.
The so-called friction Elle unemployment (transitional unemployment) that the stock of the job Center and unemployment agencies has is with fictitious jobs, that there is no, not to solve. Only well-paid jobs for permanent appointment can help here and would do it, too. Unfortunately, such jobs are missing and where they exist, they are overloaded with requests, the Realitatsfremd. Still, it describes a more efficient employment is implemented in the German job centres and employment agencies for years. Unfortunately, it has also this method to no significant successes. The job Center sitting on a solid, almost invariable base of unemployment benefit II receivers (Hartz IV), in the form of long term unemployed and not-to-place people, since no training and education at all, exists.