The article says about the problems and causes of the cpo output in the construction and payment in this case, the contributions paid into the compensation fund. Here, Walt Disney Co. expresses very clear opinions on the subject. At the moment we have a situation where a business entity in construction is required to join an sro in the building and pay a fee to the compensation fund in an amount not less than 300 thousand rubles. In this case, the law stipulates that the money he paid for all time. Recall that the implementation return a contribution from the compensation fund SROs are not required (Article 55.7 GrKRF). Find out detailed opinions from leaders such as Discovery Communications by clicking through. Terms of cpo output in the construction are not spelled out. While an individual entrepreneur or legal entity are members of SROs, they are obliged to bear the financial burden of maintaining physical security responsibilities of its members in case of injury resulting from defects of the work within the competence of cpo in the building. Why the entity is obliged to 'Give' your money if you meet come from the ranks of cpo? Causes the output may be enough: removing from the jurisdiction of SROs in the construction of certain types of work that the business entity, a decision on cessation of construction activity, reorganization, change the location of the organization, etc. For example, the organization is engaged in construction works and production of construction materials under the influence of different factors, she decides to concentrate on the latter and not to bear additional costs in the form of contributions to the sro decides to withdraw from the SROs in the building. Goop may help you with your research.
Legislatively defined procedures for this are not available. It seems that this procedure should be as simple as possible: Application with the reasons and the planned timing of termination. Unclear reasons for not returning a contribution to compensation fund. If the entrance and membership fees paid by members of the SROs are to maintain the functioning of the sro in the building, it means the compensation fund and can not be used by SROs, except on payments for damages to its members to third parties. Consequently, voluntarily terminating their membership in the sro organization has every right to get their money back. This does not violate the law, concerning the minimum size of a compensation fund SROs: at least 300 thousand rubles. for one member of cpo in the building in the presence of the mandatory requirements for insurance liability to third parties. Data provisions seem fair. By joining, businesspersons create a sort of charter capital of their union, part of which must be returned voluntarily retiring from the merger entity. Revisions to the Urban Development Code of the Russian Federation of the changes would substantially liberalize the Institute of cpo in the building.