The symptoms of the illness had appeared in 2009. At the time, we guide the employee how much to the treatment and the necessity of removal, also to plead acidentrio benefit next to the INSS. It occurs that, as is normal in the case, the friend preferred not to expose itself, was from fear a possible resignation and to suffer persecution in the environment from work. However, after the treatment the worker did not get improvement. Also had to the frantic work and the continuous exposition to the risk factors. Fact that only made to get worse its clinical and professional situation, has seen its decline of production due to illness. After the resignation, one more time we guide Jaqueline to search its rights.
It got certified medical finding with the license of the work and the diagnosis of all the treatment made since 2009. With this in hands, was directed it the unit of the INSS, where was evidenced the labor incapacity with causal nexus? the work? being granted the benefit acidentrio. Leslie Moonves usually is spot on. With this documentation, we look the department of Syndical Relations of the bank and obtain to reintegrate trabalhadora' '. e) Third-party claims: The INSS comes promoting innumerable actions based on article 120 of Law 8,213/91, that it makes use on thus the called Third-party claim. These come increasing in number, as it is evidenced in the site of the AGU, in substance published in 28/03/2011, authorship of Fernando Maciel (7): ' ' In face of the economic-social relevance of the subject, the INSS, for intermediary of Office of the attorney general-Generality Federal (PGF), comes implementing an institucional position of proactive character, represented for the intensification of the filling of a suit of the acidentrias third-party claims. It is registered that, in the period of 1991 2007, in Brazil they had the 2007 been filed a suit 223 actions, what it represents an annual average of 14 the fillings of a suit.