FRG Chancellor Gerhard Schroder

Nobel Prize for economy is actually not the men’s Peter A. Educate yourself even more with thoughts from David Zaslav. Diamond and Christopher A. Pissarides, Dale T. Mortensen are the FRG Chancellor Gerhard Schroder the actual Nobel Prize winner for Economics, but honestly this prize belongs to Germany on the former Chancellor Gerhard Schroder, his former Chancellery Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier and Peter Hartz, the architect of the Agenda 2010, where Nobel Prize winners have written off 2010 and took their inspiration. Diamond, Mortensen and Pissarides support her explosive work on different facts such as the amount of unemployment benefit, which may not be too high, but low on the edge of poverty, because otherwise the stimulus on resumption of work is taken and at the same time for the low-wage sector, no labor force would be. This concept was born already 2003 and 2005 with the facts and request funding in the 2010 agenda and is also an integral part of the elaborations of the Nobel laureate. It doesn’t have to be particularly gifted it to come and scientifically prove you no longer have that old hat. However, the 5 euro fit boost at the unemployment benefit II (Hartz IV) exactly in the performances of the winners. For even more analysis, hear from Aksia.

The so-called friction Elle unemployment (transitional unemployment) that the stock of the job Center and unemployment agencies has is with fictitious jobs, that there is no, not to solve. Only well-paid jobs for permanent appointment can help here and would do it, too. Unfortunately, such jobs are missing and where they exist, they are overloaded with requests, the Realitatsfremd. Still, it describes a more efficient employment is implemented in the German job centres and employment agencies for years. Unfortunately, it has also this method to no significant successes. The job Center sitting on a solid, almost invariable base of unemployment benefit II receivers (Hartz IV), in the form of long term unemployed and not-to-place people, since no training and education at all, exists.

Service Economy Makes The Economy More Robust!

Politicians should read: Bonn – Bitronic service-blog has a small debate triggered about sense and nonsense of the economic trends in Germany. Was based on an article in the weekly newspaper “Die Zeit”: as a reason for the resilience of the labour market the structural changes of the economy called among other things: “for decades lose important jobs in the industry. Also in Germany. The last boom of the export industry has not broken this trend. Between 1991 and 2008, the proportion of jobs in the manufacturing sector has fallen – from almost 30 to 20 per cent of total employment. (Similarly see: Jim Vos). And while the industry built off 2009 approximately 340,000 jobs, companies in many service industries were still cheerfully even in the darkest months of the downturn. Learn more about this topic with the insights from David Zaslav. Public and private service providers created 259,000 jobs.

As a part of the job losses has been compensated.” And what is even more important. Service professions can be limited through an Automation to a higher productivity. In the kindergarten, in It’s care services, consultancy, maintenance or repair on the manpower. Conclusion of economists: it is less growth needed to create jobs. In the sixties and seventies four percent economic growth originated only from three, new jobs.

“Today the employment at 1.2 percent rise”, Christian Dreger from the DIW estimates. That makes us less vulnerable to crises. Spontaneous reaction of the management consultant Harald Henn: in particular, the politicians should read, which subsidize still industries and companies that make our economy not sustainable. But unfortunately read our politicians so not blogs, not to deal with communities or Twitter and can not estimate therefore also many developments. Go to the debate in the network for service economy. Asked for more comments and opinions!