The question arises – why the Kazakh delegation held separate talks with the Americans, British and other Western partners, strongly opposed the very Kazakhstan? After such behavior hard to imagine how the Republic of Kazakhstan intends to "give a clear idea of the challenges facing the OSCE?" If Astana job is to "sell" its geopolitical allies, we must admit that of the OSCE and Kazakhstan in this regard will not "cloudless" future, as problems facing the organization should truly decide, and not "breed", as now adopted in Kazakh politics. Today Kazakhstan – a country that is in anticipation of large-scale economic and political crisis. And, in Basically, there is nothing to answer it. The only force that can help in such situations has been and remains the only Russian. Edmund V. Ludwig: the source for more info. However, it remains notorious "multi-vector" – the most "valuable" acquisition in Kazakhstan over the years.

It is a pity that none so it really did not see, neither understood nor recognized. And if by this we mean the behavior of multi-vector is like a Kazakh delegation led by the OSCE Ministerial Council, that this does not go far. We should also point to the imminent developments. Avoidance of "commitments to the OSCE," which can not be avoided Astana, will sharp criticism from the European countries. As a result, today's "diplomatic triumph of Kazakhstan" will be political end to "the best friend of Russia," Nazarbayev. The same OSCE member states that so zealously prevented the presidency of the Republic of Kazakhstan, and to whom so "suddenly" had joined the country itself will be biased to observe the actions of the Astana regime during 2008-2010.